Considered pieces on investment research, market signals and the discipline of independent thinking — for private investors who want to engage seriously with the market.
The Scurqanelix Insights section exists for one reason: to help private investors think more clearly. Not to provide tips, not to forecast what markets will do next, and not to add to the volume of commentary that is already difficult to filter. Each piece here is written with a specific research question in mind — the kind of question that tends to sit at the back of an investor's thinking without ever quite getting the attention it deserves.
Good investment research is a discipline, and like most disciplines it benefits from regular practice and deliberate reflection. The pieces collected here are intended to support that practice — whether you are working through how to read a set of company results, trying to make sense of a sharp move in a sector you follow, or thinking about how to stress-test a thesis you have held for some time. The subjects vary, but the underlying purpose is consistent: to make the research process more rigorous and more genuinely your own.
Scurqanelix does not offer financial advice, and nothing published here should be read as a recommendation to buy or sell any particular asset. What you will find instead is a serious engagement with the craft of investment research — the questions worth asking, the habits worth building, and the thinking worth doing before any decision is made. We hope it is useful.
Learn More About Scurqanelix
A company announcement rarely tells the whole story. The language chosen, the figures highlighted and the context omitted can be as informative as the headline numbers — if you know what to look for. This piece examines how to approach a regulatory news release as a research document rather than a press statement.
Read the piece →Sharp price movements attract attention, but attention is not the same as understanding. Some volatility reflects genuine new information; some reflects sentiment shifts that will reverse. Distinguishing between the two is one of the more valuable skills in investment research — and one that rewards a structured approach.
Read the piece →Most investors form a view first and then look for evidence to support it. Scenario mapping inverts that sequence: it asks you to set out a range of plausible futures before committing to any of them. The discipline is uncomfortable, but it produces a more honest picture of what you actually know versus what you are assuming.
Read the piece →A company does not exist in isolation. Understanding how a holding sits within its broader sector — and how that sector is positioned in the wider market — is an essential part of building a coherent research picture. This piece looks at how to use sector context without letting it crowd out company-specific thinking.
Read the piece →Analyst research notes are a useful input, but they are not neutral documents. Every note rests on a set of assumptions about growth, margins, competitive dynamics and macroeconomic conditions — and those assumptions are often stated briefly or not at all. Learning to identify and interrogate them is a core research skill.
Read the piece →One of the most common failures in private investing is not a failure of research but a failure of process: allowing the emotional pressure of a decision moment to compress or bypass the thinking that should have preceded it. This piece explores why separating the research phase from the decision itself tends to produce better outcomes.
Read the piece →